Marquette Warrior: Politically Correct Indoctrination: Residence Life at the University of Delaware

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Politically Correct Indoctrination: Residence Life at the University of Delaware

Via Modern Commentaries, and Michelle Malkin, a hair-raising account of coercive indoctrination at the University of Delaware.
The University of Delaware subjects students in its residence halls to a shocking program of ideological reeducation that is referred to in the university’s own materials as a “treatment” for students’ incorrect attitudes and beliefs. The Orwellian program requires the approximately 7,000 students in Delaware’s residence halls to adopt highly specific university-approved views on issues ranging from politics to race, sexuality, sociology, moral philosophy, and environmentalism. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is calling for the total dismantling of the program, which is a flagrant violation of students’ rights to freedom of conscience and freedom from compelled speech.

“The University of Delaware’s residence life education program is a grave intrusion into students’ private beliefs,” FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. “The university has decided that it is not enough to expose its students to the values it considers important; instead, it must coerce its students into accepting those values as their own. At a public university like Delaware, this is both unconscionable and unconstitutional.”

The university’s views are forced on students through a comprehensive manipulation of the residence hall environment, from mandatory training sessions to “sustainability” door decorations. Students living in the university’s eight housing complexes are required to attend training sessions, floor meetings, and one-on-one meetings with their Resident Assistants (RAs). The RAs who facilitate these meetings have received their own intensive training from the university, including a “diversity facilitation training” session at which RAs were taught, among other things, that “[a] racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality.”

The university suggests that at one-on-one sessions with students, RAs should ask intrusive personal questions such as “When did you discover your sexual identity?” Students who express discomfort with this type of questioning often meet with disapproval from their RAs, who write reports on these one-on-one sessions and deliver these reports to their superiors. One student identified in a write-up as an RA’s “worst” one-on-one session was a young woman who stated that she was tired of having “diversity shoved down her throat.”

According to the program’s materials, the goal of the residence life education program is for students in the university’s residence halls to achieve certain “competencies” that the university has decreed its students must develop in order to achieve the overall educational goal of “citizenship.” These competencies include: “Students will recognize that systemic oppression exists in our society,” “Students will recognize the benefits of dismantling systems of oppression,” and “Students will be able to utilize their knowledge of sustainability to change their daily habits and consumer mentality.”

At various points in the program, students are also pressured or even required to take actions that outwardly indicate their agreement with the university’s ideology, regardless of their personal beliefs. Such actions include displaying specific door decorations, committing to reduce their ecological footprint by at least 20%, taking action by advocating for an “oppressed” social group, and taking action by advocating for a “sustainable world.”

In the Office of Residence Life’s internal materials, these programs are described using the harrowing language of ideological reeducation. In documents relating to the assessment of student learning, for example, the residence hall lesson plans are referred to as “treatments.”
We would like to say that nothing like this could happen at Marquette. But unfortunately, this is all too similar to what has happened here.

We just blogged about propagandistic programs put on by the Office of Student Development, the University Ministry and the student government.

Then there was the Stalinist boot camp that Freshman Orientation staff had to endure.

And the “Tunnel of Oppression” staged by Residence Life and Intercultural Programs (both parts of the Office of Student Development).

The administrative bloat that afflicts most universities plays a large role in this. Way too many bureaucrats have to have “programs” to justify their jobs, and politically correct indoctrination is what comes most naturally.

Labels: , , , ,


Blogger Dad29 said...

One of the designers of the U of Del program spoke at the CTA conference here in Milwaukee.

Call to Action (CTA, aka Call to Asininity) claims to be a Roman Catholic group, but in fact is a bunch of aged termites in the Church.


8:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

John this is what is known as "higher re-education".

10:31 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Great post.

As an update, Dr. Adams from UNC-W on has reported that Delaware has dropped this unconstitutional program, in part due to the coverage from the blogosphere.

10:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's laughable. has reported that Delaware has dropped this unconstitutional program!!

For FUX sake. Yes Delaware has changed it's uber-liberal bias.


11:59 PM  
Blogger Amy said...

First, thanks for citing me.

Second, when were comments enabled? I completely missed it.

Dad29, thanks for the linkage also.

3:01 PM  
Blogger JesusIsJustAlrightWithMe said...

Wow. This is jaw-dropping. Thanks for the screen shots.

2:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home