Network Anti-Bush Bias on Wiretaps

From the Media Research Center, an account of how the media’s descriptions of President Bush’s authorization of wiretapping directed against domestic phone calls to suspected foreign terrorists:

The Senate begins hearings today on the National Security Agency’s surveillance of communications between terrorist operatives overseas and those in the United States, a program authorized by President Bush after September 11. But ABC, CBS and NBC probably think the hearings are a waste of time, since they’ve spent the last seven weeks telling viewers the NSA program is almost certainly illegal and the President is guilty of violating the civil liberties of everyday Americans.

MRC analysts reviewed the three broadcast evening newscasts and found 69 stories on the NSA surveillance program from December 16, 2005 (the day the program was disclosed by the New York Times) through February 3. Key findings:

• Illegality. Most network stories (57, or 83%) cast the NSA program as legally dubious or outright illegal. CBS’s Bob Schieffer began the December 16 Evening News by presenting Bush as tilting toward criminality: “It is against the law to wiretap or eavesdrop on the conversations of Americans in this country without a warrant from a judge, but the New York Times says that is exactly what the President secretly ordered. . . .”
• Civil Liberties. Reporters most often framed the story as about government infringing on “civil liberties” (the focus of 29 stories, or 42%), followed by concerns the President was going beyond his constitutional powers (19 stories, or 26%). In contrast, the NSA program’s role in the war on terror was the focus of just seven stories (10%).
• Bush-Bashing Experts. The networks ran soundbites from 56 experts, including legal experts, authors and security/wiretapping experts. . . . More than half of those (30, or 56%) condemned the ethics or legality of the NSA program, compared with just four (7%) who found the program justified, an eight-to-one disparity.
• Everybody Is a Target. Reporters offered their own description of who was targeted by the NSA surveillance program 134 times, just under twice per story. Only about a sixth of these descriptions (21, or 16%) stated that the government was focused on persons contacting suspected terrorists (12) or the suspected terrorists themselves (9).
  
  But most journalists portrayed the NSA as casting a wide net, targeting “Americans” or “U.S. citizens” (53, or 40%), or used terms such as “domestic” or “communications inside the U.S.” (60, or 45%). ABC’s Dan Harris even began the December 24 World News Tonight by hyping “the spying was much more widespread, with millions of calls and e-mails tracked — perhaps even yours.”

Now, is this spin fair or not? If you are a liberal, you doubtless think is is.

And that is the point.

The standard liberal talking points were echoed by the networks, and the Bush Administration’s talking points were only rarely heard.

And that’s the definition of media bias.