Marquette Warrior: Presbyterians Move Toward Politically Correct Language for the Trinity

Monday, June 19, 2006

Presbyterians Move Toward Politically Correct Language for the Trinity

From the Associated Press:
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - The divine Trinity — “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” — could also be known as “Mother, Child and Womb” or “Rock, Redeemer, Friend” at some Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) services under an action Monday by the church’s national assembly.

Delegates to the meeting voted to “receive” a policy paper on gender-inclusive language for the Trinity, a step short of approving it. That means church officials can propose experimental liturgies with alternative phrasings for the Trinity, but congregations won’t be required to use them.

“This does not alter the church’s theological position, but provides an educational resource to enhance the spiritual life of our membership,” legislative committee chair Nancy Olthoff, an Iowa laywoman, said during Monday’s debate on the Trinity.

The assembly narrowly defeated a conservative bid to refer the paper back for further study.

A panel that worked on the issue since 2000 said the classical language for the Trinity should still be used, but added that Presbyterians also should seek “fresh ways to speak of the mystery of the triune God” to “expand the church’s vocabulary of praise and wonder.”
Unfortunately, those “fresh ways” don’t square with the Biblical concepts.

“Womb” and “Friend” just flat out don’t mean the same thing as “Holy Spirit.” Likewise, turning “God the Father” into “God the Mother” simply does violence to the language of the scriptures.

But it gets worse.
One reason is that language limited to the Father and Son “has been used to support the idea that God is male and that men are superior to women,” the panel said.
Maybe somebody somewhere has used it that way, but we don’t think it’s very common.

If the Presbyterian Church wants to oppose that, they should simply say they disagree, and not mangle the language of the scriptures.

In fact Galatians says that “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Why mangle scriptural language about the Trinity when repeating Galatians makes your point?

We suspect that just quoting scripture is not trendy enough.
Conservatives responded that the church should stick close to the way God is named in the Bible and noted that Jesus’ most famous prayer was addressed to “Our Father.”
We frankly think that, if the trendy types were being entirely honest, they would say that Jesus was a sexist.
Besides “Mother, Child and Womb” and “Rock, Redeemer, Friend,” proposed Trinity options drawn from biblical material include:
  • “Lover, Beloved, Love”
  • “Creator, Savior, Sanctifier”
  • “King of Glory, Prince of Peace, Spirit of Love.”
Yes, just the sort of language to soothe the politically correct. And leave real Christians feeling a sense of intense ennui.
Early in Monday’s business session, the Presbyterian assembly sang a revised version of a familiar doxology, “Praise God from whom all blessings flow” that avoided male nouns and pronouns for God.

Youth delegate Dorothy Hill, a student at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in Massachusetts, was uncomfortable with changing the Trinity wording. She said the paper “suggests viewpoints that seem to be in tension with what our church has always held to be true about our Trinitarian God.”

Hill reminded delegates that the Ten Commandments say “the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.”

The Rev. Deborah Funke of Montana warned that the paper would be “theologically confusing and divisive” at a time when the denomination of 2.3 million members faces other troublesome issues.

On Tuesday, the assembly will vote on a proposal to give local congregations and regional “presbyteries” some leeway on ordaining clergy and lay officers living in gay relationships.

Ten conservative Presbyterian groups have warned jointly that approval of what they call “local option” would “promote schism by permitting the disregard of clear standards of Scripture.”
Those conservative spoilsports. Quoting scripture with the implication that it ought to guide a Christian organization.


Post a Comment

<< Home