Monday, April 18, 2011

Vagina Monologues Will Be On Campus

[Updated with new information and moved to the top]

We blogged, a few weeks ago, about plans by the feminist campus student group Empowerment to perform “The Vagina Monologues” on campus.

The play, quite simply, flatly contradicts Catholic teaching on sexuality, and Student Affairs’ longstanding policy holds that no events by a student group contrary to Church teaching will be approved.

However, Student Affairs has no control over academic departments in the University, and Chris Miller, Vice President for Student Affairs, informed the representatives of Empowerment that sponsorship from an academic unit would be possible. When the play was performed on campus in 2007, the Honors Program sponsored it.

This time, it will be Social and Cultural Sciences. Roberta Coles, Chair of that department confirms that the play will be performed in the Weasler Auditorium on April 30, at 8:00 p.m.

According to Coles, there will be a talkback session with the cast and faculty after the performance. Apparently, no tickets will be required. According to Coles “it’s free and it’s a good-sized venue.”

Empowerment, by the way, was one of the selected organizations that met with lesbian academic/activist Ronnie Sanlo, when she was invited to Marquette to hold secret meetings with groups on campus considered sympathetic to the gay/lesbian agenda.

The play is morally questionable in an easy half-dozen ways, anti-male sexism being only one.

The play is ultimately insulting to women. The best analysis comes not from any conservative source, but from the liberal Slate website.
The first thing that will strike nonideologues is Ensler’s clumsy prose, which ranges between bad Rod McKuen (“It was a mouth. It was the morning.”) and the very worst of Henry Miller (“Then the quivering became a quake, an eruption, the layers dividing and subdividing”). While Ensler would call this a work of desacralizing, it’s ultimately a work of desexualizing. I take a backseat to no one in my enthusiasm for the vagina itself, but the Vagina According to Ensler is a combination between a bath toy and a household appliance. Its vision of female sexuality is at least as narrow and insulting as Henry Miller: A woman is a machine you work like a crank until you produce the desired quantity of fluid — from you and from her.
Does that mean it should not be performed on the campus of an ostensibly Catholic university?

Not necessarily. Performing the play and having a critical discussion of it would be dandy. Unfortunately, the last time it was performed, only left-leaning feminists were on the panel that discussed it. It only got criticized by English professor Heather Hathaway for not being sufficiently politically correct in several ways. (In fairness, she did criticize it for being badly written and incoherent.)

So, in the “talkback,” will any genuinely critical comments, from a Catholic or other Christian perspective, be offered?

Or is it going to be another attempt to indoctrinate students into a warped feminist view of sexual liberation?

We will continue to report on this.

Labels: , , , , , ,

9 Comments:

Anonymous Dresden said...

The one good piece of news I've EVER gotten from you! Yay, MU Vagina Warriors!

3:34 PM  
Blogger John McAdams said...

Yay, MU Vagina Warriors!

Who are they going to attack with their vaginas?

9:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is no doubt in my mind, the intent behind programs that promote serious sexual sin are diabolical. Wilhelm Reich was a Jewish psychiatrist who wrote that it is useless to debate religion and God with priests and educated Catholics. He said one can
never win such a debate. Rather, entice such a person into sexual sin(s)and the thought of God will vanish from their mind and lives.
The people who have allowed this filthy production to be seen by young Catholics should be expelled from the univesrity.

1:26 AM  
Anonymous MU_posc_08 said...

Thank you for letting us know about this "artistic performance" returning to this Jesuit Institution. If I hadn't already graduated, I'd be strongly protesting the use of my tuition dollars being used to sponsor a program clearly at odds with our Catholic mission.

Man, where's Dr. Wolfe when you really need him....

His quite vocal comments the last time this hit campus were succinct and to the point.

That was one man who did not mince words.

5:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can delete this if you want to, but I can't resist:

Q: What, pray tell, is a vagina monologue?

A: The morning after a one-night stand.

10:33 AM  
Blogger John McAdams said...

The morning after a one-night stand.

That actually goes to the heart of the problem. Encouraging sexual promiscuity simply isn't pro-woman.

5:57 PM  
Blogger GTChristie said...

Bingo

5:56 PM  
Blogger Empowerment said...

I was one of the people who help put this on that year, the year after and this year. We also plan on putting it on again this coming school year. Also, I'm a heterosexual male.

I'm extremely confused how this play promotes sexual sin, is filthy, and why I should be expelled for it. I'm also confused how this play is sexist against males. Did anyone here actually see it?

7:40 PM  
Blogger Empowerment said...

I helped this occur that year, the year after and this year. Currently, I'm one of Empowerment's co-chairs. We plan on putting it on again this coming school year. Also, I happen to be a heterosexual male.

I'm confused by these criticisms, especially the one saying we should be expelled. How is this play sexist against males? How does it promote sexual sin or promiscuity?

Email me. I'm open for discussion. bea12@comcast.net

7:43 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home