Thursday, September 13, 2012

That Video That’s Getting People Killed in the Middle East

We aren’t absolutely sure what video violent Islamist types have been protesting, but a good guess is that it’s this one, scenes from which have been posted on Buzzfeed.

So this is an insult to The Prophet?

More like an insult to the audience. And taking it at all seriously is an insult to The Prophet.

As Bizzfeed notes:
The anti-Muslim “movie” that served as the spark or pretext for a wave of violent unrest in Egypt and Libya may not be a movie at all.

As the video above — cut from the YouTube video tied to a global controversy — shows, nearly all of the names in the movie’s “trailer” are overdubbed. The video is a compilation of the most clumsily overdubbed moments from what is in reality an incoherent, haphazardly-edited set of scenes. Among the overdubbed words is “Mohammed,” suggesting that the footage was taken from a film about something else entirely. The footage also suggests multiple video sources — there are obvious and jarring discrepancies among actors and locations.

However, CNN has reported that the cast and crew disavowed the movie, and the overdubbing could also have been to conceal the content from the cast itself. Gawker interviewed a woman who played a part in the movie, who said that she had had no idea what it was about when she was hired.

As The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg reported today, the supposed filmmaker, “Sam Bacile,” appears not to be a real person — or at least not the director of the movie. A consultant to the movie, Steve Klein, told Goldberg that he didn’t know Bacile’s real name and that he wasn’t Israeli as reported.

The person using Bacile’s name told the Associated Press and the Wall Street Journal that the film had been made using $5 million from those donors, as well as a sizable crew of 45 people behind the camera and nearly 60 actors. The film’s low production values make those numbers risible. Five million dollars is more than the budget of some reputable independent films, and could certainly buy a better production than what went into the Mohammad film.
The film ranks with the infamous “Plan 9 from Outer Space” as a movie that’s actually fun to watch.

You won’t be laughing with it. You’ll be laughing at it.

Labels: , , , ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous James Pawlak said...

I am curious as to how it is possible to insult that fellow Mohammed. After all, we need only report on the historical truths that he was: A murderer; A liar and treaty-breaker; An advocate for genocide; A bandit; And, the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child.

As Muslims consider the life-and-acts of that Mohammed the perfect model for all Muslim males, then how is it possible to insult Islam?

9:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Historical truths according to whom, James?

I suppose ignorance is bliss on your part, since you clearly lack any background into the historical, political, economic, and spiritual circumstances of 600's Arabia. This context enables one to develop an understanding of the complexities of Muhammad’s life.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Muhammad/myths-mu-home.htm

greencarman

5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is clearly apparent that James has no clue about the historical, political, economic and spiritual circumstances of Arabia in 600. Without this proper context, James "truths" are a figment of his imagination. Then again, Mr, Pawlak lacks any rational basis for his own "jihad" against an entire religion.

7:27 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home