Stereotyping: Liberal Version
posted by John McAdams at 7:44 PM
Monday, January 21, 2013
Previous Posts
- Head Start: Another Failed Government Program
- Politically Incorrect to Call a Beauty Queen . . ....
- Don’t Use the “M-Word” — It’s Offensive
- Egyptian Leader Mohamed Morsi on the Jews and Israel
- The Cultural Bias Behind Gun Control
- Liberals Try to Exploit Connecticut School Shooting
- Feminist Fascism — Warren Farrell at the Universit...
- More on Bogus Statistics on Campus Date Rape
- Get More Income by Soaking the Rich?
- No Global Warming for the Last 16 Years
Useful Links
Right Wisconsin — Coverage of Wisconsin news and politics from a conservative perspective.
The Louis Joliet Society — An Alumni Association trying to get Marquette to live up to its claims to be “Catholic.”
Marquette Tribune — Marquette's own junior version of the mainstream media.
Marquette College Republicans — Pretty active of late.
Marquette College Democrats — Just what the name implies, and like the College Republicans, pretty active.
Dad29 — Marquette alum writing mostly on state politics issues.
Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog — Law professors write some of the best blogs in the country, so it's good to see Marquette Law faculty joining that movement.
Shark and Shepherd — Blog from a conservative Law School faculty member.
Mark F. Johnson — Marquette Thomist theologian on various topics.
The Dimming Torch — Liberal Marquette Philosophy professor on politics and other things.
Health Reform Explained — Marquette alum writes about the changes in the health care system.
Kennedy Assassination Home Page — one of this bloggers other obsessions.
Milwaukee Young Republicans — Interesting links and news on events.
Student Blogs
Gay/Straight Alliance of Marquette — Student organization Marquette recognized claiming it was in no way in conflict with Marquette's Catholic mission
Wisconsin Blogs — A Selective List, All Highly Recommended
Atom Feed For This Site
2 Comments:
Logical fallacy. Religion =/= gun ownership. I detest everything you stand for, but even I expected better from you.
It's called "analogy." It's perfectly logical. The analogy may or may not overlook important differences between the cases, but that is an arguable matter of insight, not a matter of logic.
So what you need to do is to explain what those important differences are and why they suggest that the analogy is not telling.
Prof. Mcadams can then respond and explain why the differences you name might well exist, but do not diminish the importance of what the analogy reveals.
Then you'd have a conversation instead of an expression of hate (or detestation, if you find that hate =/= detestation).
Post a Comment
<< Home