Marquette Warrior: Lena Dunham: Trying to Get American Airlines Employees Fired Over Private Conversation on Transgenderism

Tuesday, August 08, 2017

Lena Dunham: Trying to Get American Airlines Employees Fired Over Private Conversation on Transgenderism

From the Federalist:
This week, famous millennial journaler Lena Dunham was strolling through an airport eavesdropping on a couple of flight attendants. There she was, just a right-thinking individual with fluency in approved language and a desire for a kind and compassionate society, when she heard a conversation that violated her sense of an ideal society.

Then, as any individual principally interested in kindness and empathy would do, she reported the flight attendants’ conversation to their bosses at American Airlines.

Then, filled once more with the compassion and humility that are her hallmarks, Dunham broadcast this conversation, and her reporting of it, to her millions of social media followers. American Airlines is reportedly looking into it.

Because how, pray tell, could the world be a good place if middle-class flight attendants are allowed to talk to their friends at work in any way that gives this rich, famous public emoter a sad? What have we become, as a country, if millionaire, private-school progeny of Brooklyn art-scene families can’t have their exact conception of acceptable conversation reflected back to them during every minute of a flight delay?

Here’s What Lena Dunham Had a Fit About This Time

Hearing this conversation, Dunham wrote, was the “worst part” of her night.

This is the conversation Dunham alleges she heard. They were “talking about how trans kids are a trend they’d never accept a trans child and transness is gross.”
The author, Mary Katharine Ham, goes on to observe that:
This is the sinister side of the liberal “hamburger problem” Josh Barro wrote about. His thesis is Democrats could win a lot more elections if they stop insufferably hectoring everyone about everything— for instance, insisting eating a hamburger is an inherently political act because of the public health consequences and the carbon footprint and the blah, blah, blah. He’s probably right about that, but many liberals go far beyond hectoring.

Dunham isn’t content to publicly lecture about trans issues. She wants to punish people who disagree with her, going after their jobs without so much as a conversation with them, and she expects to be thanked and honored for her good works.
This, of course, is the sort of bigotry that thrives in academia. Marquette University, in an online module on “harassment” had a little scenario where two female employees where talking to each other, and expressed their opposition to gay marriage. An employee who overheard it was offended, and it was was made clear that the women were guilty of harassment, simply by expressing an opinion that somebody overheard and disapproved of.

It’s a cliché, but worth repeating, that the people who talk all the time about “tolerance” are the biggest bigots.

Labels: , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger James Pawlak said...

The Fascist subject of your offering and her like creatures should be forced to read "1984" and be graded on their understanding---Names and grade to be published.

8:25 AM  
Blogger G. B. Miller said...

Not only is this true in academia, it's also true in any guv'ment agency.

Case in point, during a "diversity training" exercise, an example was brought up that if you had a briefcase sitting on your desk in your cube and a small piece of paper was sticking out. Someone noticed it, went into your cube and opened your briefcase to look at the paper. Said piece of paper offended them and they made a complaint. You would get into trouble for offending someone with your piece of paper, even though someone violated your privacy by breaking into your briefcase and removing a persona item.

As for general conversations, can't tell how many times that I've stopped myself during a private conversation because someone who I didn't know was walking by and could possible eavesdrop.

5:52 AM  
Blogger KeynesianPacker said...

I agree with most of this, and most of Barro's critiques.

10:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home