Thursday, March 25, 2010

Ed Schultz: Use Government to “Equal Out” Talk Radio Audience

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Women vs. Feminists: Blame For Rape

Via the Marquette feminist blog, Word Warrior, the fact that women are more likely to say that women are at least sometimes at least partially at fault when they are raped.
A majority of women believe some rape victims should take responsibility for what happened, a survey suggests.

Almost three quarters of the women who believed this said if a victim got into bed with the assailant before an attack they should accept some responsibility.
So only three quarters said a woman can get into bed with a man and not be at least partially responsible when she is raped?
One-third blamed victims who had dressed provocatively or gone back to the attacker’s house for a drink.

The survey of more than 1,000 people in London marked the 10th anniversary of the Haven service for rape victims.

More than half of those of both sexes questioned said there were some circumstances when a rape victim should accept responsibility for an attack.

Less forgiving

The study found that women were less forgiving of the victim than men.

Of the women who believed some victims should take responsibility, 71% thought a person should accept responsibility when getting into bed with someone, compared with 57% of men.
This, of course, flatly contradicts the feminist notion that rape is an issue that pits evil males against poor innocent females.

Indeed, Marquette Professor Theresa Tobin has insisted that rape is a strategy that all men use to subordinate all women.

It seems that real-world women didn’t get the memo from academic feminists.

Our theory about this is that women know far better than men how devious and scheming women can be.

And men know better than women how brutal and immoral men can be.

Whatever the reason this is an issue (abortion is another) on which real-world women don’t think like feminists think they should.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Marquette Radio Talk Show

One of our students, Joe Mahoney, has a talk show on MU radio. We were on it back in February, and had a good time. The other guests were representatives from the College Democrats and the College Republicans.

Mahoney is clearly conservative, and uses Bill O’Reily’s theme music as part of the show. He’s a nice guy, so liberals shouldn’t hesitate to come on the show and promote their viewpoint.

Or for that matter, call in.

The show is a plus for campus political discussion, and deserves a listen and maybe (especially if you disagree with something said) a phone call to debate an issue.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 04, 2010

Obama Flip-Flop on “Cadillac” Tax Plans

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Europe Doesn’t Get Religious Freedom: Majority Support For Banning the Burka

From the Financial Times:
More than half of voters in four other major European states back a push by France’s Nicolas Sarkozy to ban women from wearing the burka, according to an opinion poll for the Financial Times.

As Mr Sarkozy presses ahead with plans to ban the wearing of the burka in public places, the FT’s latest Harris poll shows the move is not just strongly supported in France, but wins enthusiastic backing in the UK, Italy, Spain and Germany.

The poll shows some 70 per cent of respondents in France said they supported plans to forbid the wearing of the garment which covers the female body from head to toe. There was similar sentiment in Spain and Italy, where 65 per cent and 63 per cent respectively favoured a ban

The strength of feeling in the UK and Germany may seem particularly surprising. Britain has a strong liberal tradition that respects an individual’s right to full expression of religious views. But here, some 57 per cent of people still favoured a ban. In Germany, which is also reluctant to clamp down in minority rights, some 50 per cent favoured a ban.

“This poll shows that the number of people in France opposed to the burka is going up and that is the product of debate on burka and national identity,” said Professor Patrick Weil, an expert on national identity at the University of Paris-Sorbonne. “But the figure is clearly going up in other countries in Europe like the UK as well, and that reflects the growing concern that there is about this issue in some parts of Europe.”

In the US, concerns about the issue are far less strong than in Europe. Just 33 per cent of Americans surveyed by Harris supported a ban, a far lower figure than the 44 per cent who said they [opposed] it.
The figure for the U.S. is appalling, but the figures for Europe are beyond appalling.

Europe, it seems, just doesn’t get individual liberty. One can be put in jail for denying that the Holocaust happened. One can be put in jail for saying that homosexuality is sinful.

As for Islam, policies tend toward two polar extremes. Either Muslims are a politically correct “minority” that gets special protection, or they are singled out (as here) for special persecution. The idea of equal liberty for all just doesn’t register there. America’s special history has created a very special political culture, which in spite of this nation’s faults is simply superior to that of Europe.

And not just in terms of liberty. It’s a culture with less class envy, more stress on individual achievement.
In Europe, while opposition to the burka was strong, few respondents said they were prepared to support the ban as part of a wider drive towards secularism in their country.

Asked if they would support the burka ban if it were accompanied by a clampdown on wearing all religious icons such as the Christian crucifix and the Jewish cappel, only 22 per cent of French people said they supported such a move. In Britain, just 9 per cent of people said they would back such a move.
One might say it’s nice that Europeans will tolerate at least some religious free expression. The problem is that, in the absence of a robust civic culture supporting religious freedom (and freedom generally), how secure at the freedoms of Christians and Jews when their free expression irritates the secular elites that control the continent?

We know the answer to that already.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, March 01, 2010

Not Everything Works Out

From a source identified only as a “D.J. on KSFO/KYA”
What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so that we wouldn’t have a fat, insensitive government running our country. Nice try anyway, George.